✳ Practice range / Audit evidence and exception governance / 8 min
The record, not the logo
Meridian Space & Robotics requires phishing-resistant MFA for all members of its VPN-Admin group. Four artifacts arrive in the March audit packet alongside an expiring contractor exception. Determine which artifact proves the control operated and how to govern the Friday expiration.
Step 1 of 2
Priya Nair asks which artifact belongs in the audit folder to prove that phishing-resistant MFA operated on VPN-Admin in March 2026. Which item should Vera Vance file?
CASE REFLECTION
Result and takeaway
first decisions matched the scenario’s best-supported answer.
Audit evidence must be a timestamped system record showing control state across the in-scope population, never a vendor logo, a policy PDF, or a chat assertion. When a time-bounded risk exception reaches its expiration date, remediate the gap, remove the privilege, or sign an explicit written renewal.
| Item | What the packet keeps |
|---|---|
| Evidence | The 24 March 2026 identity-provider enrollment report for VPN-Admin showing account names, factor types, generation timestamp, and the documented gap on casey.nguyen. |
| Not evidence | The vendor homepage logo, the policy PDF stating MFA is required, and the chat message claiming everyone is enrolled. |
| Close | Either enroll casey.nguyen on a phishing-resistant factor, remove casey.nguyen from VPN-Admin, or execute a written renewal signed by risk owner Priya Nair with jump-host scope and a new expiration date. |